Use case 1 · Error propagation analysis
Small error rates, many bad documents
The pattern
An AI tool that gets 97% of citations right still produces documents with errors, because every document carries many citations.
- Question
- How often does an AI-drafted document carry a bad citation?
- Lane
- Human review
- Basis
- Court records and standard practice
What METRIS does
- Check every citation, figure and name in AI-drafted work against its source before it leaves
- Estimate the tool's per-item error rate from audits, with an interval
- Report the share of documents sent with an unchecked item
Chance a document has at least one bad citation
At a 3% error rate per citation, 26% of documents with 10 citations contain at least one bad one; at 5%, 40%. Per-item accuracy hides per-document risk, assuming errors occur independently.
Method
- Per-citation error (e)
- 1%, 3%, 5%
- Citations per document (k)
- 1 to 30
- Audit sizes
- 25 to 800 citations
Vendors report accuracy per answer; the business is exposed per document. The conversion is simple, and it changes the decision about what to check.
How many items to audit to know the error rate
Finding 1 bad citation in 25 audited puts the rate anywhere from 0.7% to 19.5%. Auditing 800 (24 bad) narrows it to 2.0% to 4.4%.
Reproducibility
Closed-form calculations; no random draws. Python with NumPy 2.5.3 and SciPy.
Sources
This pattern is not based on any single record. Its figures come from the model stated above.
A statistical study of a pattern, not of any event. It identifies no organization or person. Simulated figures use synthetic data; published figures are industry-wide.